Sunday, October 31, 2010

I shot 248 images with the A55 and got 57 shots


For this test I used the A55 for half of each period and used the A500 for the other half. I used the same Zeiss 135mm lens the whole game.

This was the first game I've shot with the A55 where I felt comfortable using the Electronic Viewfinder. In the past I've always struggled with the viewfinder and keeping the subject in the correct area.

A usable image is one that is in focus, doesn't cut out the players hands, doesn't have too many distractions from other players and doesn't look exactly like the frame before it or the one after.

My keep rate with the A500 was 30% while my keep rate with the A55 was 23% however I did end up with 2.59 as many keepers with the A55.

One reason I think the A55 had a lower rate of usable images was because so many of the images look the same but I only kept one. Once you get the subject framed and the focus square on the face you can easily blast off 5, 6 maybe even 10 frames. They look too similar to keep but you get to pick the best face out of the bunch.

You would think the A500 would work the same but you don't seem to get as many shots off that are in focus.

All the shots were done on continuous auto focus, with the motor drive in the highest setting. I set the ISO to 1600 for the most part and shot at 1/1250 second at F2.8. For some of the A55 shots I was using 1/1000 second but thought the images were a bit light.

I must have thousands of shots that look just like these two.
Rob Skeoch
www.thepicturedesk.ca

4 comments:

  1. How is this camera A55 compares to any other Alphas?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm still playing with the A55 so can't say for sure but I believe the Sony A550 produced the best file of any of the Sony digital cameras. The A500 would be right behind.

    I know the A900 and the A850 are the top of the line, but the A500 produces a better image if the ISO is higher than 400, if the subject is moving because the focus works faster, if the focus point is not in the very centre of the frame.

    The A900 gives you a very sharp, contrasty file with tons of detail. However the sensor is almost three years old, the focus is slow and the focus squares too small. All these things are corrected on the A500.

    Comparing the A55 to the A500 it will remain to be seen which is better although I find the Auto White Balance in the A500 better than my version of the A55... which is a pre-production camera.

    -rob

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bob, Thanks for all your input!!! I am currently contemplating an upgrade to the A55. I shoot quite a bit of my son's hockey games and would love the option of having this camera's video capability as well. Have you used this camera's video to shoot hockey, and what are your overall impressions of the camera for the same?

    Thanks again!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've only done a bit of video with it so far. I'm going to take a class on shooting video with an SLR so should know more after that.

    ReplyDelete